翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Kellner, Wisconsin ・ Kellner-Béchereau ・ Kellner-Béchereau E.1 ・ Kellner-Béchereau EC.4 ・ Kellners Corners, Wisconsin ・ Kellnersville, Wisconsin ・ Kello Rovers F.C. ・ Kellock–Taschereau Commission ・ Kelloe ・ Kelloe House ・ Kellog ・ Kellogg ・ Kellogg (name) ・ Kellogg Arena ・ Kellogg Biological Station ・ Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton ・ Kellogg Brothers ・ Kellogg Casey ・ Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co. ・ Kellogg College, Oxford ・ Kellogg Community College ・ Kellogg Creek ・ Kellogg Foundation for Education in International Relations ・ Kellogg Glacier ・ Kellogg High School ・ Kellogg House ・ Kellogg House (Cincinnati, Ohio) ・ Kellogg Interchange ・ Kellogg Public Library and Neville Public Museum ・ Kellogg School Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton ： ウィキペディア英語版 Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton ''Kellogg Bridge Company v. Hamilton'', , was an Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose lawsuit which took place in 1884.〔(discussion )〕 == Background == The company Kellogg Bridge Co. undertook to construct for the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company an iron bridge across Maumee River at Toledo, Ohio. After doing a portion of the work it entered into a written contract with Hamilton (a subcontractor) for the completion of the bridge. The bridge was put up in several spans and in order to support the spans, falsework, consisting of piles driven in the river between the piers upon which the spans were to rest, was needed. The Bridge Company had previously constructed a part of the falsework involved in between the first and second spans, which Hamilton paid for as he had agreed to do. A part of the falsework put up by the company sank under the weight of the first span and was replaced by Hamilton. When the second fixed span was about two-thirds complete, ice in the river broke up due to a flood and the falsework was carried away causing the whole of the iron material in place on that span to fall into the river. If the piles had been driven in more firmly, they would have withstood the force of the ice and the flood. Hamilton was subject to delay of the completion of the bridge and increased expense. Hamilton brought suit in the State court to recover the contract price of the bridge, extra claimed to be done on it, and the damages sustained by the insufficiency of the false work constructed by the Bridge Company for $3,693.78. On diversity jurisdiction, the cause was removed to the Circuit Court of the US where the Bridge Company answered with a counterclaim for $6,619.70. The trial ended with a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $3,039.89. The defendant brought a writ of error to reverse that judgment. The case came to the Supreme Court. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.